Amicus brief for University of Mississippi faculty in a First Amendment appeal
Filed on behalf of three University of Mississippi faculty members, supporting the appeal of a university employee fired over a social media post. The brief sets out the university’s own history of suppressing speech on matters of public concern, and argues that history is the lens through which its stated reason for the firing should be read.
- Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Docket
- No. 26-60184
- Filed
- July 23, 2026
- Our role
- Amicus counsel
- On behalf of
- Three University of Mississippi faculty members, James M. Thomas, Wendy Goldberg and Graham Pitts, in their individual capacities
- Status
- Pending
- Attorneys
- Andrew Canter
Lauren Stokes was fired by the University of Mississippi after sharing a social media post. She sued under the First Amendment, the district court dismissed her claims, and she appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
The firm filed a brief in support of reversal on behalf of three members of the university’s faculty: James M. Thomas, Professor of Sociology; Wendy Goldberg, Senior Lecturer in Composition and Rhetoric; and Graham Pitts, Assistant Professor of History and International Studies. Each joined in an individual capacity. Their shared interest, as the brief puts it, is in the university’s consistent adherence to the First Amendment when it regulates faculty and staff speech.
The brief is a history. It traces the university’s record from the 1950s and 1960s, when the state’s Sovereignty Commission and the Board of Trustees of State Institutions of Higher Learning worked together to surveil, list and punish faculty and students who spoke against segregation, through the uneven progress that followed, to the modern university’s considerable First Amendment muscle. It argues that, in light of that history, the university’s stated reason for Ms. Stokes’ termination deserves close scrutiny rather than deference, and that the federal courts have a distinguished record of enforcing the First Amendment at the university when the university would not.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression filed a separate amicus brief in the same appeal. The case is pending.
Documents
Coverage
More of the firm’s filings are on the Representative work page.
